Quote:
|
Would it be smart to buy a new computer?
|
While I have 2GB of RAM, you have a faster computer than I do for recording. If you set up a dual boot on that system, I would expect you to be very happy. I would get it up to 2GB of RAM, however.
Quote:
|
And moving my computer back and forth really isn't an option (all the gear is downstairs). Should I just upgrade my current computer...
|
Depends on the results you want. If your room is really bad sounding for tracking or mixing you are going to have an EXTREMELY tough time making anything sound good. Of course, I'm going on your word that your rooms sound bad. I may not agree.
Quote:
|
would it be smarter to buy a great one now, that would last me through college
|
Computers are like women. The "great" looking ones now are sagging crap tomorrow. It's the nature of the beast. I NEVER buy a great computer because I know they are a money pit. If you are on a budget, the last thing I'd dump a ton of cash into is a high end PC (by modern standards). I've created some pretty decent recordings with my Athlon 64 2800 computer. You could build one of these for $400 without any problem.
Quote:
|
Are laptops bad for recording, mixing, sampling (I would like to get a midi controller with nice software down the road), etc.?
|
No, but you can expect lower performance with a laptop if specs are the same.
Quote:
|
The soundblaster sound card will not give you the low latency you need for recording audio.
|
Anyone even halfway serious about recording should DEFINITELY own a low latency audio interface designed for home recording. See my home recording soundcard wizard in my signature.
Quote:
|
You can experiment with the KX drivers they work with some soundblaster cards and they are free;
|
You can also chase your own tail repeatedly. I'd recommend simply buying an audio interface with the cash you were going to throw in a NASA caliber computer.
Brandon