Go Back   Home Recording Forum > Recording Engineers / Producers > Audio Engineering

Audio Engineering Discuss audio engineering techniques such as mic placement, technique, and gear selection. Discuss the recording of drums, electric guitar, acoustic guitar, bass, vocals, and more.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-27-2009, 07:40 AM
brandondrury's Avatar
Supreme Overlord Commander
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 19,209
Rep Power: 25
brandondrury has disabled reputation
Default Removing Shure SM7b Foam Cover

I've seen a million pictures and videos of big boys using a Shure SM7b with no foam cover. I've always wanted to remove mine, but I just assumed they ripped the damn thing off. I've had too many bad experiences with breaking stuff for the short term just to end up biting the bullet in the long term.

Tonight I used the Shure SM7b on a kick drum. (I've really gotten into that lately!) When I was pulling the mic out of the hole, I crazed the front head. It was like that part in Shawshank Redemption when the warden says "What about you fuzzy britches?" and throws the rock through the cavebabe poster.

It was an epiphany.

It was a moment of clarity.

My foam cover popped right off. It has a plastic ring on the inside and it's obvious that it was designed to do this. Great!

I left the Royer R121 in it's case tonight and used the SM7 on the electric guitar cabinet. It was perfect!

Brandon
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2009, 06:33 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 155
Rep Power: 5
dangercityskyline is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Removing Shure SM7b Foam Cover

hmm, that's interesting. i've never actually seen one without the cover, every time I've seen it used in videos and pictures and such it's always it on.

can you get pictures?
__________________
when i grow up, i want to be phantom powered.

"Not a bad buy for the money. As it is said, you get what you pay for. It has okay features, but I don't understand what it condenses. I poured a can of soup on it, but it nothing. It did not condense it. Extremely disappointing. I had to heat it without adding water."
-review of MXL 4000 tube condenser on Musician's Friend
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2009, 06:52 PM
Audio~Geek's Avatar
God Jr.
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,271
Rep Power: 27
Audio~Geek will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Removing Shure SM7b Foam Cover

LOL

didn't yours come with two different pop filters?

There's 3 settings as I see it for an SM7
1-No foam windscreen + normal pop filter (female vocals) or for amps
2-Thin foam (rock screaming vocals and close proximity dialog recording)
3-Thick foam (outdoor dialog)


I've seen lots of pictures and videos of them both on and off.

Atreyu and Lamb Of God have videos with sm7 vocals.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2009, 06:56 PM
TonyB's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,274
Rep Power: 47
TonyB is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Removing Shure SM7b Foam Cover

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandondrury View Post
I've seen a million pictures and videos of big boys using a Shure SM7b with no foam cover. I've always wanted to remove mine, but I just assumed they ripped the damn thing off. I've had too many bad experiences with breaking stuff for the short term just to end up biting the bullet in the long term.

Tonight I used the Shure SM7b on a kick drum. (I've really gotten into that lately!) When I was pulling the mic out of the hole, I crazed the front head. It was like that part in Shawshank Redemption when the warden says "What about you fuzzy britches?" and throws the rock through the cavebabe poster.

It was an epiphany.

It was a moment of clarity.

My foam cover popped right off. It has a plastic ring on the inside and it's obvious that it was designed to do this. Great!

I left the Royer R121 in it's case tonight and used the SM7 on the electric guitar cabinet. It was perfect!

Brandon

Doctor Brandon,

Good info on your 7b surgery! I've never used the 7b for a kick drum. How's it differ from the 112 and 52. I use the 112 on the beater side and the 52 on the front/hole side.

Now that you got the cover off, what're going try to do with the 7b? I'm wondering how much difference will be heard.

Also, is the term "clarity" just a coincidental term?
__________________
TonyB
_________________
www.myspace.com/myguesthousestudios
www.guesthousestudios.com
"Can I have a little more talent in the monitors, please?"
Good Song + Good Arrangement + Good Performer + Good Performance + Good Acoustic Environment + Good Recording Chain + Good Monitoring Chain + Good Engineer + Good Luck =
Good Product
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2009, 04:56 PM
brandondrury's Avatar
Supreme Overlord Commander
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 19,209
Rep Power: 25
brandondrury has disabled reputation
Default Re: Removing Shure SM7b Foam Cover

Quote:
How's it differ from the 112 and 52. I use the 112 on the beater side and the 52 on the front/hole side.
I've not used the D112 or Beta 52 hundreds of times like I have my trusty Beta 91 (my favorite by far), but I'll give this a go.

While I know people have gottent he D112 to work, it doesn't fit my idea of what a kick drum should sound like. It never has. When I pull up the fader to the kick drum, it's there, but it's like it is not there. I don't know how to describe it. It's not necessarily an attack thing because it seems that no amount of EQ seem to fix it (although I'm a bit hesitant to write that). That's just how it feels.

I remember the Beta 52 being in a similar ballpark, but maybe a bit more meaty sounding. It's been a while and I've only used the Beta 52 once or twice.

It's really hard to describe this in text. When I switch from a D112 to a Beta 91, I immediately say "Ahhhhh. There it is!". I still may end up EQing the shit out of it, but it's always a good sound right off the bat. The 91 has a way of highlighting all the good things in a kick drum mic.

The SM7 is not the Beta 91. It's different. It's more like what I would imagine a D112 is supposed to be. So far it's been dramatically punchier sounding in the 100-200Hz department without getting as cloudy. When I EQ the SM7 I feel like I'm able to get what I want. Regardless of the drum, I always seem to lean towards sample replacement when I use a D112.

So that's the short version.

In a pinch I can definitely use a D112 and it won't be the end of the world. It's like getting burgers when I'm really in the mood for pizza. In the scope of things it's not a huge deal.

However, to anyone who needs a kick ass workhorse mic that works on a variety of sources, the SM7 is very hard to beat. It makes sense to buy it as the main kick drum mic and main vocal mic.

Brandon
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2009, 07:04 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 155
Rep Power: 5
dangercityskyline is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Removing Shure SM7b Foam Cover

Quote:
It's really hard to describe this in text. When I switch from a D112 to a Beta 91, I immediately say "Ahhhhh. There it is!". I still may end up EQing the shit out of it, but it's always a good sound right off the bat. The 91 has a way of highlighting all the good things in a kick drum mic.
hmmm.
that is interesting.

i've always wondered how you place those things. they're definitely an odd shape, and the shure website doesn't help: "just throw it in your kick drum and play!"
do you really just sit it on the pillow or whatever?
or do you use something to prop it up?
__________________
when i grow up, i want to be phantom powered.

"Not a bad buy for the money. As it is said, you get what you pay for. It has okay features, but I don't understand what it condenses. I poured a can of soup on it, but it nothing. It did not condense it. Extremely disappointing. I had to heat it without adding water."
-review of MXL 4000 tube condenser on Musician's Friend
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2009, 07:10 PM
Audio~Geek's Avatar
God Jr.
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,271
Rep Power: 27
Audio~Geek will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Removing Shure SM7b Foam Cover

The website is pretty accurate LOL

It's prettymuch omnidirectional, of course placing it closer to the beater results in more attack, closer to the shell more body, you just drop it in the center of the drum.

I'm gonna have to order me one. Brandon's comments on the D112 are identical to mine.
D112 is fine if I have some good samples.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2009, 07:37 PM
TonyB's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,274
Rep Power: 47
TonyB is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Removing Shure SM7b Foam Cover

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandondrury View Post
I've not used the D112 or Beta 52 hundreds of times like I have my trusty Beta 91 (my favorite by far), but I'll give this a go.

While I know people have gottent he D112 to work, it doesn't fit my idea of what a kick drum should sound like. It never has. When I pull up the fader to the kick drum, it's there, but it's like it is not there. I don't know how to describe it. It's not necessarily an attack thing because it seems that no amount of EQ seem to fix it (although I'm a bit hesitant to write that). That's just how it feels.

I remember the Beta 52 being in a similar ballpark, but maybe a bit more meaty sounding. It's been a while and I've only used the Beta 52 once or twice.

It's really hard to describe this in text. When I switch from a D112 to a Beta 91, I immediately say "Ahhhhh. There it is!". I still may end up EQing the shit out of it, but it's always a good sound right off the bat. The 91 has a way of highlighting all the good things in a kick drum mic.

The SM7 is not the Beta 91. It's different. It's more like what I would imagine a D112 is supposed to be. So far it's been dramatically punchier sounding in the 100-200Hz department without getting as cloudy. When I EQ the SM7 I feel like I'm able to get what I want. Regardless of the drum, I always seem to lean towards sample replacement when I use a D112.

So that's the short version.

In a pinch I can definitely use a D112 and it won't be the end of the world. It's like getting burgers when I'm really in the mood for pizza. In the scope of things it's not a huge deal.

However, to anyone who needs a kick ass workhorse mic that works on a variety of sources, the SM7 is very hard to beat. It makes sense to buy it as the main kick drum mic and main vocal mic.

Brandon
Thanks. I've been using samples to supplement the 112 on the attack side as well. You're right, it wasn't the sound I was expecting; almost like using a coat hanger to beat on a tissue box. Glad to see it's not just me. I may try the 7b in place of the 112.
__________________
TonyB
_________________
www.myspace.com/myguesthousestudios
www.guesthousestudios.com
"Can I have a little more talent in the monitors, please?"
Good Song + Good Arrangement + Good Performer + Good Performance + Good Acoustic Environment + Good Recording Chain + Good Monitoring Chain + Good Engineer + Good Luck =
Good Product
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
clarity, cover, drop, drum, electric, guitar, issue, mic, recording, rock, sample, shure, vocals

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shure SM7B Reviews brandondrury Microphone Reviews 6 02-05-2009 04:33 PM
Is This Inexpensive Studio Foam Worth Buying?? millett513 Home Studio Equipment 2 09-16-2008 02:08 AM
Why Do I Need Acoustic Foam? MetalDave Acoustics and Studio Construction 13 07-08-2008 11:27 PM
Shure SM7b Andrew07 Audio Engineering 2 01-26-2006 04:10 PM
Shure SM7b Andrew07 Audio Engineering 8 11-20-2005 08:26 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Inactive Reminders By Mished.co.uk

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91