Audio Technica AT4050

[OmSvaha]

Hi, Everyone-

Like many people on the forum, I'm putting together my first home project studio. Here's what I'm looking for info on:

The microphone I'll be getting needs to be versatile (I'll only have that one and my Shure SM58), and, as I'm a saxophonist, I'll be using it to record saxophone a lot. It doesn't need to be said that the Neumann U67 & U87 have given me some of the best results I've ever had in professional recording situations. But, like most people, those mics are waaaaay beyond my mean as of now. So, I'm looking for a good large diaphragm condenser mic in the $300 to $500 range that will do the job (a "poor man's U87").

So far, it looks like the Audio Technica AT4040 is the way to go. But there are lots of other choices out there - AKG Percep400, AKG C300B, Shure KSM32/CG.... In my price range is there really a marked difference in quality between these mics (and others like them), or does it come down to a matter of taste, not better or worse?

Any advice is greatly appreciated....

~Arun

Arun Luthra -- Saxophonist, Composer, Arranger -- New York City

[brandondrury]

The U67 is typically a lot BIGGER sounding than a SM 58 or a Neumann U87. The big thing with a saxaphone is making sure it isn't harsh or shrill. In this price range, there are quite a few good mics. If I were you, I'd start out with a Kel HM-1. They are only $100 and have been getting GREAT praise in the big boy recording world because they are the only cheap mic that doesn't have a stupid high end boost.

I hear the AT 4040 is really good. I have an AT 4050 that may do well on sax, but it would depend on the desired tone. The AT 4050 can get a little harsh / shrill on the wrong source.

Brandon