| |||||||
| Computer Nerds Not sure about RAM, CPUs, Motherboards, video cards, and operating systems for home recording? This is the place. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
|
I'm looking to possibly set up another workhorse PC for sampled drums, and running amp sims (don't yell at me!) Here are my options: 1. A networking VST plugin (one of these). I'm guessing this would be simplest to set up, but have the most latency. Does any one have any experience with any of these (or others) that work smoothly? Support for non-realtime export would be awesome 2. MIDI Timecode 3. VST System Link #2 and 3 are both in the sync dialog in cubase. It looks like they don't actually send audio data, just timestamp data through a midi or audio cable. So if I only have 1 real audio interface are these out of the question for me? And are there any other options I missed? Thanks guys
__________________ If this post is really short and has bad grammar, I probably posted it from my cell phone. So gimme a break. |
| |||
|
If you choose to use the vst system link, you will need another audio interface, because audio data is being sent from one computer to the main computer. Unfortunately no matter how you do it, Midi is just code, and information, and although you can process on another computer, that audio must still be sent to the main computer through some type of audio format.
|
| ||||
|
wouldn't you think that some of the better interfaces might have an option for routing the data from 2 pc's.... it would certainly be do-able. Actually, looking at some of those on the page, you don't need an interface (just a decent soundcard to deal with the audio). The audio/midi data is transported via the LAN (Network) - so you should be fine as long as you can happily playback your DAW via your soundcard
__________________ IBM T41 thinkpad: 2Gb Ram Cubase 3 SE Alesis IO26 Interface Headphones / HiFi for monitoring! Too many cigarettes copious amounts of tea Last edited by Phlipper; 11-05-2008 at 05:07 PM. Reason: more information |
| |||
| Quote:
Actually, looking at some of those on the page, you don't need an interface (just a decent soundcard to deal with the audio). True, but that's the point, you need separate sound cards for this task. The audio/midi data is transported via the LAN (Network) - so you should be fine as long as you can happily playback your DAW via your soundcard In some cases yes, but for cubase vst system link, the audio/midi data is sent over a spdif connection, they don't yet support transmission of this data over a LAN, the LAN is just used for networking. Also keep in mind that if you did use the system link, then you would need to buy another license for cubase to use on the second computer. To avoid this you can use your plugins and vst instruments in standalone mode on your second computer, and go digital out into your main computer via the interface. Last edited by PAETEK; 11-05-2008 at 05:29 PM. |
| ||||
| Quote:
Quote:
So basically, this whole system link thing isn't exactly giving your system more power. It's basically turns your second computer into a hardware effects processor. That has it's merits, I guess. I would be nice to run a few CPU intensive processes on a second machine. It seems that this could be achieved with external busses if you really wanted to although it may not be as convenient. Brandon |
![]() |
| Tags |
| audio, audio interface, cubase, drums, interface, latency, midi, recording, sync, vst |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mix core? DSP farm? 888/24? | Cheers2yourtears | Pro Tools | 0 | 07-25-2008 06:39 PM |
| Acoustic Guitar:Room options:Help!! | EnSkorSang | Audio Engineering | 5 | 06-04-2008 05:05 PM |
| Studio Issues... So Many Options... WHAT TO DO?? | lkoreality | Solve Technical Issues | 2 | 12-18-2006 11:55 PM |