| |||||||
| Computer Nerds Not sure about RAM, CPUs, Motherboards, video cards, and operating systems for home recording? This is the place. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
|
Depending on the nature of the plugin, some take lots of RAM, some take lots of processing power, some take both (and your firstborn!). Guitar Rig is edging towards the latter category, so if your kids are running around your feet, time to put them to bed. Reverbs, if they're decent, also tend to be in the last category. Time for a new computer. i7, loads of RAM and a 64bit OS. Or you could freeze the channels and unload the plugs you're using so you can use more. Guitar Rig is your biggest culprit I'm sure. Freezing or otherwise printing guitar rig to the tracks its attached to will get you a decent amount of overhead back. Keep a backup of the un-effected audio in case you need to change your mind on what you used. |
| ||||
|
Hey Dakoom, Another way that could save a little RAM if the two instances of Guitar Rig are running the same preset, or patch, is to load only one instance of Guitar Rig to a track folder. Basically, if you have two different guitar tracks that are meant to have the same patch from Guitar Rig, group those two guitar tracks into one track folder...then, just apply the one instant of Guitar Rig to the track folder, which automatically applies the effect to however many guitar tracks you have contained within that folder (I hope that makes a little since). I know in Sonar 8, you can do this. In your DAW software's help manual, there should be something called "track folders," or the like, if that capability exists in your DAW software...just a thought... Also, as a general rule, the more RAM you can get, the more your computer can handle at once. Good luck to you...
__________________ METALTYME __________________ |
| ||||
|
Thank you for your advice!
__________________ I'm italian, I am learning english.. so, please, if you see any errors in my grammar or spelling, let me know via PM. Danke! Mac Pro Quad-Core Intel Xeon 2,66GHz, 3GB RAM, Mac OS Snow Leopard 10.6.1 Logic Pro 9, Alesis IO26, AKG MKII. AKG C214, SHURE PGDMK4, SHURE SM57, SAMSON C01, SHURE SM58 |
| ||||
| Quote:
The best solution is to upgrade to a Quad core. I was in your same boat about a month ago. I put together a cheapo system with a Quad Core processor for $400. I loaded up 10 instances of Guitar Rig and then got bored. It still had power to spare. On a real mix I can be completely about what plugins I use. The same when I'm MIDI sequencing. Brandon |
| ||||
|
I will consider your advice. Thank you, Brandon.
__________________ I'm italian, I am learning english.. so, please, if you see any errors in my grammar or spelling, let me know via PM. Danke! Mac Pro Quad-Core Intel Xeon 2,66GHz, 3GB RAM, Mac OS Snow Leopard 10.6.1 Logic Pro 9, Alesis IO26, AKG MKII. AKG C214, SHURE PGDMK4, SHURE SM57, SAMSON C01, SHURE SM58 |
| |||
|
Your P4 processor uses a socket 478 connector and the best you can do is get a slightly faster one, but that will gain you little. The ram you are using is the older ddr and costs more than the latest ddr2 and ddr3. I would take their advice and freeze tracks until you can get the cash for a newer system. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| add, audio, computer, guitar, midi, mix, problem, vst |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| going from sx3 TO 5... PLUGINS:... | mainly | Cubase | 4 | 06-08-2009 06:36 PM |
| Best VST plugins | the_kiddy | Solve Technical Issues | 8 | 05-29-2009 10:43 PM |
| Free plugins | fabmusic | Plugins Reviews | 0 | 11-19-2008 09:02 PM |
| best plugins for $300 or less? | Guastafarian | Home Studio Equipment | 6 | 07-04-2008 12:43 AM |
| Too Many Plugins? | Spunky Munkey | Audio Engineering | 15 | 11-05-2006 03:01 AM |