Go Back   Home Recording Forum > Recording Engineers / Producers > Solve Technical Issues > Computer Nerds

Computer Nerds Not sure about RAM, CPUs, Motherboards, video cards, and operating systems for home recording? This is the place.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2009, 03:09 AM
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 1
nervousbreakdance is on a distinguished road
Question Which is best?

Hi there.

I don't know terribly much about computers, and as such, I've not had much luck with them. My problem is:

I have two VERY OLD PCs that have been reconstructed by computer-savvy friends. One I am using at the moment, the other is sitting around with its hard drive removed. On this one, I am running EVERYTHING (Windows XP) and it runs slower than the human brain can comprehend.

Would it be better for me to move all my recording stuff (Cubase, Several dozen VSTis, Drivers for Tascam US22L etc etc etc.) on to the other one, having wiped the hard drive?

In basic terms, what I am asking is this: Is it better to run two seperate computers: One for recording, another for everything else? Would an OLD OLD OLD PC run just as slow with considerably less on its hard drive?

Or am I better off buying a new one?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2009, 04:20 AM
Renegade Studios's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 310
Rep Power: 8
Renegade Studios is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Which is best?

I would say buy a new one... The benefits of putting a new harddrive in a old computer is like putting a bmw engine in a ford...

Newer hardware is faster, lighter and capable of doing things that those other 2 computers can dream about...

Step ur game up you owe it to yourself and your music...
__________________
Anthony Bigs
Developmental Sound Lab Studios 1 & 2 (Formally Renegade Studios)
www.devsoundlab.com
www.myspace.com/beatardation
www.devsoundlab.com/products.html-Gear list
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2009, 05:59 AM
Audio~Geek's Avatar
God Jr.
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,271
Rep Power: 27
Audio~Geek will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Which is best?

I had to use the computer at the copy shop today, it was beyond slow. I've never used a computer slower than that and I grew up with a Commodore 64. The same place also thought it was fair to charge me $1.21 for a single page print.

As a musician, or any kind of creative person you need a computer that can keep up with your flow of energy.
For me, Quad core with 4GB of RAM is about as fast as I can think.

1- computers ARE cheap these days $400 gets you a decent system, $1000 gets you a hotrod
2- the savings in time and wasted energy are priceless
3- it's an investment in your music career
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2009, 01:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,082
Rep Power: 23
tacman7 will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Which is best?

Ah the c 64.

You get a real insight into how computers work from a beginning in Commodore.

---------------

New computer +1

newegg.com is the best for building your own.
__________________
I never finish a mix, just abandon it.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2009, 02:58 PM
Renegade Studios's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 310
Rep Power: 8
Renegade Studios is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Which is best?

I loved the c64... I had the chance to play with that in Jr. High... Oh do I miss computer class.. it was soo much fun... lol (Basics ROCKS!)
__________________
Anthony Bigs
Developmental Sound Lab Studios 1 & 2 (Formally Renegade Studios)
www.devsoundlab.com
www.myspace.com/beatardation
www.devsoundlab.com/products.html-Gear list
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:28 PM
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0
Oscat01 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Which is best?

Without your specs it's hard to say. But a PC soley for Cubase will run better than a PC used for everything. More headroom for memory, harddrive etc.
But I agree with prevailing view -- Upgrade your PC, especially if your still using a singlecore processor.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2009, 05:06 PM
TonyB's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,274
Rep Power: 47
TonyB is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Which is best?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Renegade Studios View Post
I loved the c64... I had the chance to play with that in Jr. High... Oh do I miss computer class.. it was soo much fun... lol (Basics ROCKS!)
I didn't get the Commodore 64 because I didn't think I needed all that memory.... 64K! So instead I got the TI-99/4A with 16K!

Not kidding! I thought I would never need 64K of memory so I didn't pay the extra $200 to $300 for the C64.
__________________
TonyB
_________________
www.myspace.com/myguesthousestudios
www.guesthousestudios.com
"Can I have a little more talent in the monitors, please?"
Good Song + Good Arrangement + Good Performer + Good Performance + Good Acoustic Environment + Good Recording Chain + Good Monitoring Chain + Good Engineer + Good Luck =
Good Product
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2009, 05:13 PM
TonyB's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,274
Rep Power: 47
TonyB is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Which is best?

I bought a Rain Recording PC in 2005. It was a PIV with 700MHz and 1GB RAM.

I've since upgraded it many times to where it is now a completely different computer (only the chassis case is the original).

Since 2005, it's on a third motherboard and third CPU (PC IV to Dual Core to now a Quad Core). I saw noticeable improvement on each major upgrade (don't count RAM upgrade as a significant upgrade moneywise, but improvement-wise, yes).

Did I save money? Possibly, but it was easier on the wallet to make smaller upgrades here and there.

It seems like a significant hardware upgrade is needed every 2 to 3 years to keep up with the expanding requirements of audio software.

Now if anyone can help me keep up with the ever expanding demands for more hard drive space. I'm constantly eating up 200GB - 320GB external USB drives archiving my audio data.
__________________
TonyB
_________________
www.myspace.com/myguesthousestudios
www.guesthousestudios.com
"Can I have a little more talent in the monitors, please?"
Good Song + Good Arrangement + Good Performer + Good Performance + Good Acoustic Environment + Good Recording Chain + Good Monitoring Chain + Good Engineer + Good Luck =
Good Product
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2009, 08:28 PM
fmw's Avatar
fmw fmw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 267
Rep Power: 7
fmw is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Which is best?

Not enough information. How old? What processor and operating system. I might be able to give you some upgrade advice with some more information.
__________________
Fred

http://www.computerhq.us
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2009, 02:19 PM
Gabriel_S's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 2
Gabriel_S is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Which is best?

Personally I would definitely get a new computer. With that said I would STAY AWAY from off the shelf computers eg. Best Buy etc. You want a computer with as few background apps as possible, absolutely no junk programs like Works, AOL demos and all the other junk you get with off the shelf comps. Also you want not just a fast CPU but at the minimum of 2 HDs with 32 mbs cache per HD (Audio is very much cache reliant), one for your OS and programs and the other for your Audio files. Also off the shelf computers normally have intigrated soundcards and video cards. These are HUGE CPU and memory hogs. If I was in your shoes I would go to Rain Audio or PC Labs, find a nice sytem, get their specs and have a pro build one for you. Will save you a ton of cash and you'll have a comp that will last you years since you'll always be able to upgrade it as the need arises

Gabriel
__________________
Cubase 4 | Cubase 5 | Ableton 7 | AMD Phenom™ II X4 3.2 Ghz with Arctic Ice | Seagate 500 gig (OS) and 1.5 Tb (Audio) HDs, 32 mb cache each | Gigabyte MOBO | XP Pro 64 SP2 | 4 gigs Kingston DDR2 1200 Hyperextension Ram | 850 watt power supply | Antec Sonota 111 case | Korg Triton Extreme | Korg M50 | A bunch of VSTi's I never use
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
audio, cubase, music, problem, recording, soundcards, tascam

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Inactive Reminders By Mished.co.uk

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91