i've been reading and reviewing and bashing songs over in the forums here.
one of the common advices that i have read are as follows.
1) bring the kick up to make it punchy.
2) bring the vocals up and compress it to give it a bigness to its vocals.
3) make the bass less muddy.
4) bring the guitar up front.
....to borrow from Yul Bryner's King Mongkut... etc etc etc
(in a nutshell, my conclusion may be wrong but roughly thats it)
i believe that they are all good and valid advice.
i was listening to Purple Rain just earlier today and it struck me how much it moves away from all the advice i have mentioned above.
compared to Beat It, which was THE recording standard of that day (some say still is), it is not of 'high quality' (for lack of a better term).
Beat It sounds polished, crisp, clear. basically it follows all the advices that we in this forum have been 'preaching'.
Comparatively, Purple Rain, had its snare drum so very loud that it overpowers everything else. if you dont believe me, listen to it. it is as if, the snare WAS the main vocals. and the guitar was untastefully delayed (compared to tastefully delayed by lets say.. David Gilmour).... and so on so forth, you guys get the picture. the kick was small compared to the snare.. VERY small.
now, David Z, the guy who engineered the album, although not as legendary as Quincy Jones, is no amateur.
my first question is: at a time, when crisp clear mixes were easily achieved, why do YOU think he mixed it in such a way?
my second question is: with reference to the Death Magnetic bashing thread

a while ago, how does a 'terrible' sounding record (if you want to call it that, but feel free to bash me if you disagree) be one of the pinnacles of music recording? sub question: how come, in your opinion, Death Magnetic is a terrible record? (give other reasons other than metallica's a washed up band and loads of clipping on the record).
PS-i think that Thriller and Purple Rain are great records in terms of engineering and songwriting.