Great mega post, Dach!
I'm going to summarize some of the things, Dach said for a few reasons:
1) To re-enforce what he is saying and hopefully drive the point home.
2) To make sure that those who haven't read the whole post (which everyone should) at least catch the main points.
3) Because when I use this for my upcoming article, I can quickly get to the best quotes.
Quote:
|
I don't have a relevant reply but I look at it like this... almost everything I've heard from no-name bands, local, circuit, even touring openers... was just not that good... the music wasn't too bad but something's always lacking... they just don't stand out.... perhaps the songwriting was lacking... maybe performance or arrangement issues etc... or the vox just didn't have character.... or the band is just plain ugly!
|
Solve this and you make zillions!
Quote:
|
When I listen to some of the stuff done by the top producers... I rarely find myself thinking - gee... this sounds empty here or this just doesn't make sense or stuff's fighting each other or the climax doesn't climax!.... whatever... I may not care for the music or the overall timbre of sound but the presentation is key... they just present everything in an almost perfect fashion with no stones unturned... what would I change about the presentation of these songs??? nothing!
|
The value of a great producer is illustrated well, here. Very nice, Dach.
Quote:
|
Directing that objectivity back at your own work is difficult and a separate process from writing, engineering and mixing... it's almost akin to arranging except that you are "arranging" or directing the writing, arrangement, performances, natural flow of dynamics, engineering and mix towards the best possible presentation.
|
Another reason why the big boys almost always use producers!
Quote:
|
A good song is a good song period... but a good song can be a great song if it's presented properly
|
Again, I couldn't agree more.
Quote:
|
what do the people expect to get out of this... how do I get there with this.... etc..
|
This illustrates that writing has to cater to people. If you write only for yourself, the odds are great that no one else will like it...for obvious reasons. This doesn't mean that you can be personal and put your own heart into your music. It just means that if no one else gets the same feeling you do, then you screwed up.
Quote:
|
most likely the problem is the bands themselves - telling themselves that it is good enough and don't want to spend the extra effort or $$$ to improve their performance
|
This is a big reason why I'm moving toward exclusively writing and colaborating with other songwriters using a sequencer. At least when I work with another songwriter, he has to impress me. That's at least one person down. Even though, I'm still very new to producing, I won't except anything I don't think is awesome. (Although now that I think of it, I've had to compromise from time to time or risk a mutiny).
Quote:
|
rare is the band that can self produce and turn out something that I'll listen to more than once.
|
This is just another way of stating what was listed above. If you haven't considered working with a producer...good luck!!
Quote:
|
just what is it the local bands expect?
|
This is another great question. Do you seriously think you can compete with the big boys of your genre? You can, but odds are strong that you'll need to use your noggin a little bit and work differently.
Quote:
|
Most everyone I've ever been involved with just does not have the determination to make it happen
|
If you don't have something wrong with you that makes you completely sickened by the fact that you don't have hit songs, you probably won't make it. You may want to consider just doing a live recording in the studio and calling it a day.
Quote:
|
just remember, what musicians think does not count
|
Most of the bands I work with are 100% concerned with what the other local bands in the area are going to say. This is NOT the crowd you should be going for!
Brandon