|
|||||||
| Register | Donate | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Guitar Forum That's right. This board is for for guitar players. |
|
Welcome to the Home Recording Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
Ads
|
|
||||
|
tomi engdahl has a suggestion at
Simple mixer but i don't know if home audio stuff is similar enough to guitar-ing gear... |
|
||||
|
no effects loop... but i used two inputs on a friend's amp and got a similar enough type of sound out of it. the sounds blended pretty well until one effect turned off and then the other was getting squirrel-ly, making weird noises. the problem i'm having is combining two signals to superimpose their waveforms. and apparently more electrical issues like matching impedances, etc.
|
|
||||
|
i may not be a huge expert at guitar effects but can't you run one line straight through your first effects pedal and then the output of the one into the input of your second, then run out of that pedal into your amp.
i think you can still have both on at the same time. i could be completely wrong but i thought that was how it worked.
__________________
Always Ask Questions |
|
||||
|
what you (lamppost effect) are describing works but the sound of the lowest frequency in the effect limits the sound of the rest when they're in series like that. it's like the weakest link in a chain, versus putting two links on one other one to split the force on the chain at that point.
|
| How I Eat |