New To Audio Recording? Download Killer Home Recording: Setting Up FOR FREE!
View RSS Feed

Ken J

Room Resonance Control: Why you monitors appear to sound like crap.

Rate this Entry
by , 02-01-2012 at 04:36 PM (1077 Views)
I have heard so many stories on why monitors / speakers sound like crap in a home studio. For the purpose of this article I will refer to all speakers no matter what they are call as monitors because in the home or professional studio we monitor the sound tracked or mixed. Monitor accuracy is subjective and we tend to look at the specs with a grain of salt. For the end user the accuracy of a monitor is not in its specifications but in real time usage in the studio. So many people state that they have tried many monitors from the budget basement to top of the line and have had problems with all of them. Maybe it's not the monitors. Just maybe it the room and how that room sounds in relationship to the monitors. No monitor will be accurate unless the listening environment is corrected.





Bass Traps
Sound is conveyed through waves in the air. Waves that exist between a pair of surfaces can create standing wave resonances whenever the distance between the surfaces is any even multiple of one-half of the wavelength. At resonant frequencies (tones), the sound is louder and decays much more slowly than at non-resonant frequencies, causing uneven tonal quality and interference with clarity. Resonant frequencies occur mainly in the bass range, due to the relationship between the wavelengths of low-frequency sounds and the typical sizes of listening rooms.


This wave is in a standing wave resonance since it's wavelength equals the distance between the pair of surfaces.

Every room has its associated resonant frequencies. Rooms built using preferred dimensions ratios have potentially more even distributions of these resonant frequencies. Room built with angles walls or ceilings have more complicated resonant modes than typical rectangular rooms and the resonances can be potentially less severe. But, no matter what the size or shape of the room, resonant frequencies can be controlled through the use of bass traps.


Bass frequencies occupy all the notes on the left half of the keyboard (Everything below middle C). Since this is such a large portion of the musical spectrum, and because every room has potential resonant frequency problems in this bass range, it is imperative that the low frequencies be the first issue to address in improving any room's acoustics. Of course, each specific room's geometry, setup, and application dictate how to best optimize the bass performance.

Comb Filtering
Sound and music propagate through waves and, therefore, must abide by the laws of wave physics. This means that when 2 waves "collide", they do not bounce off one another as is the case with physical objects. Instead, at that location in space and moment in time, they either add their combined amplitudes to some degree or cancel their combined amplitudes to some degree.


Waves exactly in phase add to make a wave with twice the amplitude.


Waves exactly out of phase add to make a wave of zero amplitude.


Waves out of phase to a small degree add to make a wave with
slightly higher amplitude than either wave individually.


The wavelength of the 2 sound waves and the difference in the distances they have traveled determine whether they add to or subtract from the combined resulting amplitude. This means that there are a series of adds and cancels at various frequencies of sound for any given room setup.


There are many potential reflection points that can cause a sound launched from a source to return to that source and interfere with itself. There are also many potential ways for sounds to travel from one source to another and cause interference. Likewise, there are many ways for sounds launched from single or multiple sources to arrive at a central listening position at different times and interfere with one another there. All of these interfering waves cause the resulting amplitude of the sound to either increase or decrease to some degree depending upon the frequency (tone) of the wave. The resulting adjustment to the amplitudes at each frequency is called a comb filter.


Comb filtering effects are reduced by placing acoustically absorptive materials at the reflection points responsible for the interfering waves. The materials must be of a size and type to properly address the frequencies of each specific problem. Rearranging the speaker setup will simply shift the locations of reflections and alter the problem frequencies, but does not remove the problem.
Although locating the precise positions of problem reflections can be a complex task, there are a few locations where controlling the reflected wave is sure to make an improvement to the sound.


Primary sidewall reflection points


Perpendicular reflection points
Convectuoso and JoshERTW like this.

Updated 02-01-2012 at 04:44 PM by Ken J

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags
Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Ken J's Avatar
    Flutter Echo
    There are certain paths for sound that produce a repeating loop. Every time the wavefront passes the listener it is heard as the sound is intended, but with a twist. Just as when you "click" the individual prongs on a comb in quick succession, the quickly repeating sound of the wavefront continuously passing the listener produces a distinctive "zinging" tone. This is known as flutter echo and is due to our brain's desire to interpret air pressure fluctuations at some frequency as a particular tone. For this is exactly what is occurring as the wavefront continuously passes your ear at some rapid rate.




    The flutter paths are most commonly located along lines between parallel surfaces. Speakers located between parallel surfaces are constantly sending sonic wavefronts into the repeating loops of these flutter paths.



    Convectuoso and JoshERTW like this.
  2. Ken J's Avatar
    Reflection Control
    As seen in sections 2 and 3, controlling room reflections is fundamental to creating accurate sound reproduction in any room. In addition to utilizing precisely selected panels addressing comb filter and flutter problems, it is also generally desired to include the proper combination of absorption and diffusion to control sounds reflected throughout the room. The desired balance of absorption and diffusion is obtained through selection of appropriate absorptive material and proper placement to create diffractive diffusion and/or multiple time-delayed specular diffusion.


    Edge-effect diffractive diffusion


    Multiple time-delayed specular diffusion

    The proper placement and selection of panels to attain the desired reflection control is determined on a case-by-case basis due to the large number of variables involved.

    Reverberation Time
    Sound produced within any enclosed space will continue to exist in that space for some amount of time after it is created, decaying away until it is inaudible. If this decay time, known as the room's reverberation time, is too long, sounds will linger within the space and begin to overlap with new sounds being made, creating an unintelligible caucauphony.


    Long reverberation time = Poor Intelligibility


    Short reverberation time = Good Intelligibility

    A sufficient amount of acoustic absorption is required at all audible frequencies of sound in order to keep the reverberation time in a room short enough to have good intelligibility. The measurement of the reverberation time in a room is often referred to as RT60. The desired RT60 at a frequency varies from room to room.
    Convectuoso and JoshERTW like this.
  3. Convectuoso's Avatar
    Great article. Very informative and obviously comes from a deep understanding of acoustics. Well done
  4. JoshERTW's Avatar
    Here's a question - I recognize that the diagram's are schematic in nature, but they show the speakers pointing "straight past" the listening position (i.e. if they were on the corners of a desk they would be square with it).

    Is it better to angle the speakers in towards your listening position, or have them square with your desk? I have mine positioned about 4" out of arms reach, with the woofers pointing roughly right at my ears (with the centre of the cone being maybe an inch below my actual ear level).

    The back of my room is WAYYY far away (19'), but the speakers are almost right against the front fall at the moment - like 3-5" away (that is where my desk is). I've also got my listening position centred within the 11' width of the room - on the left side there is a stairwell, and on the right there is a wall.

    I had the listening position slightly off centre (more towards the corner than the stairs, and only off by a few inches) but figured I should centre it. I'm wondering if I should move out from the wall a little bit and add some treatment behind the speakers and on the side walls - Back to my original question - where I hang the absorption panels (going to build them 2x2 with 3" rockwool) will be affected by if my speakers are angled or "square" - so which way is technically, right? (or like much of this recording business, is there no such thing as right?)
  5. Ken J's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshERTW
    Here's a question - I recognize that the diagram's are schematic in nature, but they show the speakers pointing "straight past" the listening position (i.e. if they were on the corners of a desk they would be square with it).

    Is it better to angle the speakers in towards your listening position, or have them square with your desk? I have mine positioned about 4" out of arms reach, with the woofers pointing roughly right at my ears (with the centre of the cone being maybe an inch below my actual ear level).

    The back of my room is WAYYY far away (19'), but the speakers are almost right against the front fall at the moment - like 3-5" away (that is where my desk is). I've also got my listening position centred within the 11' width of the room - on the left side there is a stairwell, and on the right there is a wall.

    I had the listening position slightly off centre (more towards the corner than the stairs, and only off by a few inches) but figured I should centre it. I'm wondering if I should move out from the wall a little bit and add some treatment behind the speakers and on the side walls - Back to my original question - where I hang the absorption panels (going to build them 2x2 with 3" rockwool) will be affected by if my speakers are angled or "square" - so which way is technically, right? (or like much of this recording business, is there no such thing as right?)
    Yes the monitors point straight back. This is only for illustration. If I were to correctly angle the monitors into the proper triangle for listening at a mix station, the reflection arrows would be all over the place. I wanted you guys to get the basic idea on reflections. Remember that room size is going to play a big part in how the room reflects.

    The listening position (where your seat is located) should be at 38% of the total room length and the monitors should make an equilateral triangle with the third point slightly behind your head.

    The side acoustic panels should be just in front of the monitors at their sides on the walls. A 2x2 panel is not enough to do anything for you. I would go to at least 2x4 vertical with the center of the panel centered on the LF driver. 2x6 would be better then 2x4.

    Check out Ethan Winer's website. The link I am giving you shows the 38% rule, monitor positions, and side panel locations. It will help you calculate your room and proper placements.

    Ken J
    RealTraps - How To Set Up a Room
    JoshERTW likes this.
  6. JoshERTW's Avatar
    Uggh - Took some quick measurements, and 38% is going to kill the amount of space I have for my drums in here

    I've also got the speakers sitting on my desk, not on separate stands (they are isolated with Auralex pads at least)

    The problem I face is my control room is also my tracking room - Going to 38% would cause me some issues. I think I can go to about 26% comfortably, and rig up some cinderblock stands. I'm sure that will help.

    Thanks for this article and the link to the RealTraps article - I've watched a couple of their videos before but never realized they had an articles section - I think I've now got a significant amount of reading to do haha
  7. Ken J's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshERTW
    Uggh - Took some quick measurements, and 38% is going to kill the amount of space I have for my drums in here

    I've also got the speakers sitting on my desk, not on separate stands (they are isolated with Auralex pads at least)

    The problem I face is my control room is also my tracking room - Going to 38% would cause me some issues. I think I can go to about 26% comfortably, and rig up some cinderblock stands. I'm sure that will help.

    Thanks for this article and the link to the RealTraps article - I've watched a couple of their videos before but never realized they had an articles section - I think I've now got a significant amount of reading to do haha
    That's the problem with many home studios, SIZE. Kinda hard to fit 50 pounds in a 10 pound bag. Going 26% may cause you even more issues while mixing. Especially if your monitors are rear ported. Forget the cinder blocks and stack plastic milk crates zip tied together. If on their side, at least you can store stuff in them. BTW: a six gallon plastic milk crate will house full size rack gear 19" in case you wanted to know. Hard times and the need for rack space taught me that creative lesson.

    I've never been a fan of anything Auralex. The panels and bass traps are much less effective then standard rockwool or Owens Corning 703. Also 2" of thickness glued on the walls is almost worthless for acoustic damping. It's like putting a solid back on an acoustic panel. You need an air gap between the acoustic panels and the walls to be the most effective.

    Shooting you over to Ethan's site was more for convenience then anything else. I could have keyed in all the proper info and made up a few drawings but my laziness got in the way. It was just easier to link you to the info.
  8. JoshERTW's Avatar
    The only auralex I have is the little pads that the speakers sit on. I plan to build any "real" treatment myself with 3" Roxul.

    The monitors are front ported ( with thin vertical ports): BEHRINGER: B2031A

    I also haven't bothered tweaking any of the pads/EQ stuff on the back of the speakers because I was told (and this seemed reasonable to me) that doing so was generally not going to help you but instead mask issues in your mixes.

    I like that rack idea...will have to investigate that further!
    Updated 02-02-2012 at 06:12 AM by JoshERTW
  9. dudermn's Avatar
    I have this theory that sound waves hold proof of multiple dimension.
    If you have a source of sine-wave of 2hertz and you also have a source of 6, than wouldn't a third wave of 3 be generated by the combination of phase and what-not ?
    The reason why I consider it another dimension is because the 2 and 6 waves still exist but the 3 is the one that is perceived.
    How bad is this theory? I can't get my head around it.
  10. Ken J's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by dudermn
    I have this theory that sound waves hold proof of multiple dimension.
    If you have a source of sine-wave of 2hertz and you also have a source of 6, than wouldn't a third wave of 3 be generated by the combination of phase and what-not ?
    The reason why I consider it another dimension is because the 2 and 6 waves still exist but the 3 is the one that is perceived.
    How bad is this theory? I can't get my head around it.
    Graphs of a sound wave are represented in two dimensions while the sound wave itself is three dimensional. Just as air pressure is three dimensional.

    If you are talking multi dimensional as in two planes or crossing over to another life like going to heaven, then no one has reported back with positive proof that I know of.

    Your question: "If you have a source of sine-wave of 2hertz and you also have a source of 6, than wouldn't a third wave of 3 be generated by the combination of phase and what-not ?"

    My answer: If you take jello and vodka and mix them together, do you not get jello shots? Thinking too much just as doing too many jello shots gives you a head ache.

    Wrap your head around a few jello shots and stop thinking about sound waves. That's too much thinking for me at 6:30 AM. I'm only on my first cup of coffee.
  11. highland-piper's Avatar
    Ken,

    Is there a practical application for all this if we don't have expensive test equipment? How do we improve the sound of our room? Or alternately, are there ways to test for this stuff without equipment?

    Thanks!
  12. Ken J's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by highland-piper
    Ken,

    Is there a practical application for all this if we don't have expensive test equipment? How do we improve the sound of our room? Or alternately, are there ways to test for this stuff without equipment?

    Thanks!
    The best we can do as home studio owners is use ball park figures for acoustic treatments. Acoustic panel manufacturers like Real Traps and the like do this all the time and get reasonable results. We are not going to get the perfect room because we are working usually within four pre-constructed walls designed and built as a bedroom or other room in the house. Even if we custom build a room such as in a opened raw basement constructing all four walls, the results will not be perfect. However we can get close or at least reasonable. That's all we need to shoot for.

    According to a few acoustic engineers I know our best bet is to trap all four corners and hang defuser panels at key points in a preexisting room. In a room we are constructing from the ground up such as in a raw basement, we can plan treatments built directly into the walls. The best designs are not standard rectangular rooms but usually have six to eight sides with a slot system. Unfortunately this takes up a lot of room.

    The inserted picture is a basic design that can be built in a basement or garage area. Note the brown shaded areas are acoustic materials such as Owens Corning 703. The interior walls of the studio are covered in slats of finished wood with spaces between them so sound waves can pass into the acoustic material. The slats are adjusted so we can get a room that is acoustically corrected but not too live or too dead. Opposing walls are not parallel. Note that there is no door to this room because it is a concept design. A door must be put in somewhere.

    Also please note that to construct any room from the ground up inside your home, the cost is about $6 per running foot assuming an eight foot ceiling. This is for wood stud and drywall. No electric, no acoustic treatments, no heating and air conditioning. Just the basic walls constructed as a do it yourself project. So for a basic 10x15 foot room it will cost $300 in studs and drywall alone. The figure of $6 per running foot is assuming drywall on one side only. Add $2 per running foot if drywall is applied to both sides of the stud work.





    Here is a basic design that I will be using in my home basement as my new personal studio. The actual design will not have the acoustic traps as shown but rather be built into the walls using a system of acoustic panels from floor to ceiling in specific stud spaces while the balance of the walls will be drywall. The ceiling will be an acoustic grid panel setup just like in any retail shop or office. This way I can place clouds directly into the ceiling area using the joist space as an air gap.
    Updated 02-11-2012 at 07:44 AM by Ken J
  13. highland-piper's Avatar
    Thanks for the drawings Ken, that helps a lot. I have a pretty large basement room that has paneling, carpet and acoustic tile ceiling. I wish the ceiling were higher, but it is what it is. ;-)
  14. Ken J's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by highland-piper
    Thanks for the drawings Ken, that helps a lot. I have a pretty large basement room that has paneling, carpet and acoustic tile ceiling. I wish the ceiling were higher, but it is what it is. ;-)
    Wishes are like crap in your hands. When you clap your hands, the crap splats all over the place. Take the crap out of the wishes and make things happen for yourself. What you can do is remove some of the acoustic tile over your sitting area and make up a cloud in the hole created. This is assuming that you have the older 12x12 acoustic tiles that were glued to ceiling slats. They can be carefully cut at the seams and the new cloud inserted using a cover frame and fabric to hide the edges. It should look good and with cloud now being at ceiling level, you won't have to duck.

    My grid style ceiling will allow me to place clouds exactly where I want them in 2x2 or 2x4 panels. The grid system will be placed at 7'-10". I have 8' from the floor to the bottom of the joists. The ceiling joists are 8". That gives me room for 4" of acoustic material with a 4" air gap. If I need more acoustic material, I can add another few inches and still get reasonable results.

    I'm currently investigating a fabric called elastic micro-suede. I was told by a few acoustic engineers that the product has been used as a cover for OC703 and rockwool with very positive results and is suppose to be reasonably acoustically clear but not allow partials that break off the acoustic panel itself to penetrate the fabric. Many people have problems with fiberglass dust. There are also a lot of people who just take any fabric that they like and looks good to make bags for acoustic materials for their home studios. Then they wonder why they have problems when working in the studio concerning the air quality. The eyes get red and burn and the throats has dryness problems stemming from the acoustic materials floating in the room air. Air quality is a big problem in many home studios.
    Updated 02-18-2012 at 07:04 AM by Ken J