Re: tube pre-amp into audio interface
Hi rol,
I've tried this before ,believe it or not, and probably pretty close to your setup.
I originally bought an M-Audio Duo some time ago ( 2003ish maybe? ), played around with it for awhile and quit before really mixing anything.
When I picked up recording again, and started getting into VSTi's (specifically DFH Superior) , I noticed the latency was way to high to trigger the instruments via MIDI real-time.
At that time I also had purchased an ART Tube MP single pre to try to **** up the stale sound of my bargain bucket consenser ( AKG perception 200 ).
Since the latency was such an issue for drum triggering I purchased an RME Multiface ( rock-solid at 64 and even 32 samples ).
Anyway, my setup went from an M-Audio Duo straight to Mic....to RME AD/DA to ART MP to Mic. At some point in between I did have the ART run to the M-Audio interface while still using the M-audio as the main interface before I bought the RME. After I bought the RME, at one point, I tried adding the M-Audio back into the chain between the ART and the RME.
In the end, the differences were EXTREMELY subtle.
In all honesty I couldn't be sure that the differences weren't due to mic placement or just performance in general but it did seem like having the extra pre ( with phantom off ) smoothed it out a miniscule amount..not necessarily in a good or bad way.
Point is, even if it does impart some small character ( and I mean small ), it can easily be remedied at the source with different mic placement, changing the source (i.e. amp settings,etc) or giving the EQ a bit of a notch.
It may have some effect on transients and harmonics, but if that's the case I didn't hear it. ( Or maybe I just suck? ...pretty likely )
And for the record my higher quality interface had minimal, if any, effect on the overall sound. I only kept it for the speed and stability.
( P.S. So I guess W-A-R-M is a naughty 4 letter word now? )
|